We've gathered here the most common questions that arise when reviewing our documented fieldwork. The answers are straightforward and avoid unnecessary technical jargon.
We choose cases that show a clear and verifiable process, not just flashy results. We prioritize initiatives where we were able to accompany the fieldwork, record decisions, and cross-check data with local sources. Each case includes the context, the real limitations, and the adjustments we made along the way.
Yes. In each case study, we indicate the province, the work period, and the sources consulted. When we mention figures, we clarify whether they come from our own surveys, public agencies, or academic studies. If a number could not be confirmed, we say so explicitly instead of omitting it.
Because measuring real impact requires time and consistent methodology. In some projects, visible effects only appear after several seasons. We prefer to show partial progress with its context rather than invent indicators we cannot sustain. When there is solid data, we include it along with its methodology.
In most cases, yes. Many of the sites we document are open to the public or have designated trails. In each case study, we indicate whether access is free, requires prior permission, or has seasonal restrictions. We also recommend contacting local authorities before planning a visit.
When we detect an error or receive a well-founded correction, we update the case and add a footnote indicating what changed and why. This applies to both numerical data and process descriptions. Transparency also means acknowledging when something did not go as expected.
Yes, and we take them seriously. The most useful suggestions usually come from people who know a specific territory or issue. If you have a proposal with context and local contacts, we can evaluate it for future editions. Write to us through our contact page with the details.
Looking for more specific information on how we document our work? Check out our transparency policy or consult the terms of use of the site to understand the scope of each publication.
Cases and experiences
Each conservation and environmental education project leaves a concrete mark. These are the voices of institutions, teachers, and communities that participated in our initiatives across different provinces.
"The wetland survey they carried out in the Salado basin allowed us to adjust the management plan with real data. The team worked with our park rangers for three months, and the final report was clear, without unnecessary technical jargon."
Marcela Ríos
Coordinator of Natural Areas, Santa Fe
"The agroecological garden workshops they taught at the school turned the yard into a living classroom. Fifth graders now keep the crop log, and families joined the community composting effort. It's a change you notice every day."
Jorge Medina
Primary School Principal, Mendoza
"We needed a local biodiversity assessment to present to the municipality. The fieldwork was rigorous, and the final document helped unblock the ordinance protecting native woodland. They met the deadlines and answered every question."
Lucía Ferreyra
Environmental Assembly Representative, Córdoba
Rural schools, municipalities, cooperatives, and grassroots organizations from more than ten provinces participated in restoration, environmental education, and community monitoring projects.